Sentencing
IPRT recognises the critical role of sentencing in the penal system.
Our starting point is that imprisonment itself causes a number of serious social harms, therefore imprisonment should only be used sparingly at the point of sentencing and the numbers in prison should be reduced.
As a key strategic goal for IPRT, we aim to promote the embedding and extension of the principle that detention should only be used as a last resort, while remaining committed to retaining and supporting the principles of proportionality and judicial independence in sentencing.
The principle of parsimony in the use of imprisonment is reflected in section 96 of the Children Act 2001, which directs sentencing courts to use imprisonment only as a last resort. IPRT believes that this principle should also be enshrined in legislation for adult offenders and that there should be an onus on judges to exhaust all other options before imposing a custodial sentence. IPRT will be monitoring closely over the next few years how this principle is being applied in relation to the youth justice system.
In practice, we believe that greater transparency in sentencing can be achieved as well as better coordination between sentencing authorities and other agencies on the penal system.
Scotland: Using short term sentences does more harm than good. 9th June 2009
Locking up prisoners for short periods of six months or less could endanger public safety, according to prison chiefs in Scotland. (The Carrick Gazette) Read more
IPRT Position Paper 3: Mandatory Sentencing 28th May 2009 
A Position Paper setting out IPRT's position on mandatory and presumptive sentencing. Read more
Position Paper on Mandatory Sentencing 28th May 2009
A Position Paper, published May 2009, outlining IPRT's position on mandatory and presumptive sentencing. Read more
Sentencing in the District Courts, 2003 7th January 2005 
In June 2003, the Irish Penal Reform Trust (IPRT) undertook a research study on patterns of sentencing in the Dublin District Court. Read more
