1st February 2021
The briefing examines to what extent the specific developmental needs of young adults are taken into account by courts when making decisions about whether to remand defendants into custody. It also looks at the existing legal provisions which could be applied at the remand stage of criminal proceedings, and whether criminal justice agencies and courts think about the maturity of young adult defendants when making decisions about remanding them.
Ultimately, interrupting a young adult’s development with a period in custody, including remand, should be a last resort.
If young adults aren’t remanded in custody the report looks at what alternatives are available, particularly young women, and defendants with mental health problems.
The report notes that, in 2018, almost 3,000 eighteen- to twenty-year-olds were remanded to prison before trial and 2,000 of those were held in custody between conviction and being sentenced. Numbers in the 21 to 25 age range are significantly higher although the published data does not enable them to be separately identified.
Specific data is not available about the extent to which young adults remanded to custody subsequently receive a custodial sentence. However, in the year ending March 2019, over two thirds of children under 18 remanded to youth detention accommodation did not subsequently receive a custodial sentence.
For children, the court must have regard to the welfare of the youth and thus, has a specific obligation to consider a bail application even if the court has already refused bail. However, for adults, repeated bail applications normally require a change of circumstance. There are no special considerations for young adults, who face the same procedures as other adults.
The report details five recommendations for developing and advocating for a strategy to make remand arrangements more suitable for dealing with the developing maturity of young adults:
Read Young Adults on Remand: A scoping study for T2A on the T2A website here.