Irish Penal Reform Trust

Parliamentary Question: Prison Privatisation

15th October 2003

60. Aengus Ó Snodaigh asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the Government's plans for privatising aspects of the criminal justice system, including prisons; and the reasons for same. [23467/03]

62. Mr. Cuffe asked the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform the plans in development by the Government for the privatisation of prisons outside of the current package of measures under negotiation with the Prison Officers' Association. [23468/03]

Mr. McDowell: I propose to take Questions Nos. 60 and 62 together.

As the House will be aware, the Prison Service has, for some time, been in negotiation with the Prison Officers' Association on a new deal to enhance significantly the operational efficiency of our prisons and reduce costs, particularly overtime costs. The package of measures under negotiation does not refer to any proposal for privatised prisons. The present focus of the proposals is to enable publicly managed prisons to deliver an efficient and effective service, which is what the taxpayer and the people deserve. The Prison Officers' Association is due to ballot its members on the proposals very shortly.

The existing cost of the Prison Service is unsustainable. In the absence of agreement, the Government will decide urgently on measures which it has recently discussed to significantly reduce costs in the service. It would not be helpful or appropriate for me to outline at this time the measures that will be considered by Government if agreement cannot be reached with the Prison Officers' Association by the end of this month. I very much hope that agreement can be reached very soon and that the necessary progress can be made on the basis of consensus.

Aengus Ó Snodaigh: The Minister is being clever in his answer. In May, at the conference of the Prison Officers' Association, he said: "If I had to secure capital investment from outside Exchequer sources for the prison system, I would consider doing so." On 22 August the Evening Herald reported that a radical plan existed to privatise prisons. The following day, the director of the Prison Service, Seán Aylward, confirmed that there was a contingency plan to hand over prisons to private operators and to close at least four smaller jails if the talks proved unsuccessful. On 19 and 22 September, the director confirmed that he was considering the privatisation of some of the functions of the service, such as the escorting of prisoners, and that the privatisation of prisons had not been ruled out. On 24 September the Minister said in the Irish Independent that he would not privatise prisons except as a last resort.

More recently, on 3 October, in response to a direct question he only confirmed, cleverly, that the Government offer to the Prison Officers' Association does not refer to prison privatisation. Does a contingency plan exist in the Department to privatise prisons? Is the director of the Prison Service spoofing or lying? Has the Minister definitely ruled out prison privatisation? A straight answer is required.

Mr. McDowell: I reject the imputation against the honesty and integrity of the director of the Prison Service, who is doing a wonderful job to bring about change that has been needed for so long and which is now about to occur. On the quotations the Deputy has strung together, if he examined carefully each link in his chain of evidence, he would find that each of them is flawed. For instance, what I said to the prison officers in Galway was that if I had to secure capital for the Prison Service from outside the Exchequer, I would do so. Capital expenditure on prisons does not involve running or maintaining prisons, which involve a current item of expenditure. The point I made to the prison officers was that the current pattern of cannibalising the State's budget for capital development in prisons to pay for massively excessive overtime is unsustainable and will not continue.

I can state categorically to the Deputy that there is no plan in my Department to privatise the Prison Service. I reiterate that our priority is to run a decent prison service as a State service and to do so within a containable budget. There may well be circumstances in which individual functions, which are now carried out by the State in respective prisons, could be carried out by others. One example would be a public private partnership to construct any new prison accommodation. Other examples include the escorting of prisoners to and from courts and maintenance and service facilities within prisons, such as stores. I will consider all these things, but it must be emphasised that it is my preference that the Prison Service be run, if possible, as a State service by officers employed by the State and subject to the control of the State.

The partial diversion of the capital budget of the Prison Service into paying for excessive overtime, which has been the case for some years, must not continue. The prison officers have been given a fair deal. They are now balloting on it and I hope they will accept it. It must be made clear to all concerned that the present circumstances are unsustainable and I will take action to prevent them from continuing.

Mr. Cuffe: It seems there is certainly an agenda at play on this issue. The prison at Shanganagh in the Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown area has been closed. We are told that it will be sold to raise funds for the Prison Service. There are remarks on the public record about the possible sale of Mountjoy Prison and its moving to somewhere on the M50, no doubt adjacent to the proposed national stadium.

There is a serious concern that this is privatisation by stealth. When one talks about the possible privatisation of the transportation of prisoners, is this not the thin end of the wedge? Where will it end? If one privatises some of the services of the Prison Service, one will be implementing privatisation by stealth. This means that profit, rather than the welfare of prisoners, will be the guiding motive. We need look no further than across the water to the United Kingdom to see the dangerous precedent of even partial privatisation. When partial privatisation was introduced there ten or 15 years ago, it was regarded as impinging on only a small part of the prison service. The United Kingdom now has the most privatised prison system in Europe. Does the Minister perceive it to be a success, bearing in mind that prison officers in the privatised service have been charged, on many accounts, of not looking after the welfare of prisoners?
We need a clear answer regarding whether the Minister considers the tendering of transportation services to be partial privatisation. Does he regard the selling off of certain prison lands as simply being a way to improve the existing prisons or is it a move towards more complete privatisation?

Mr. McDowell: I thought I made it very clear that I have no plans for privatisation of our prison institutions.

Mr. F. McGrath: What about transport?

Mr. McDowell: The optimal position, over which I stand, is that prisoners be accommodated in prisons governed by the State and staffed by the State through its own officers. However, there is room for improvement and more economical practices in respect of some areas of support services for the Prison Service or incidental services on the periphery of its core activities. It would be a dereliction of my duty to the taxpayer if I did not address these issues.

3 o'clock

The fundamental question the Deputy raises about the future of individual prison campuses is different. If I have to relocate the Mountjoy Prison - I emphasise that no decision has been taken in this regard - it will be entirely without prejudice as to whether such an institution would be built on a public private partnership basis. My preference, of which prison officers should be aware, is that the Prison Service should continue to be staffed by officers of the State. If this is made impossible, I will confront the matter.

In the meantime, I urge everybody to attempt to arrive at consensus to allow prisoners to be cared for in State-controlled, run and owned prison facilities in which the officers who look after prisoners are public servants.

Mr. Cuffe: Does the Minister recognise that if he were to introduce a public private partnership, it would give rise to the danger that profit would be tied to the number of prisoners incarcerated? Does he perceive a risk that an increase in prison numbers would work to the advantage of any company involved in a public private partnership?

Mr. McDowell: I cannot imagine entering into an agreement for the construction of any facility in which the provider of the facility would be remunerated by reference to whether the courts sent people to the institution in question for punishment or on remand. There is no such danger and the suggestion is fanciful. I have clearly set out my policy preference. I ask other people, particularly the members of the Prison Officers' Association, to make it possible for me to provide for the taxpayer and community at large a Prison Service within reasonable economic cost boundaries. This is not currently the case, but it will be, in one way or another. I ask that it be achieved by way of agreement and consensus, rather than confrontation.

Our work is supported by

Respect for rights in the penal system with prison as a last resort.

Subscribe

Legal

Contact us

This website uses cookies to provide a good browsing experience

Some are necessary to help our website work properly and can't be switched off, and some are optional. Click on "Choose cookies" below for more information on the cookies being used on this website. Please note that based on your settings, not all functions of the website may be available. You can manage your preferences by visiting “Cookie preferences" at the bottom of any page.

This website uses cookies to provide a good browsing experience

Some are necessary to help our website work properly and can't be switched off, and some are optional. Please choose the cookies to allow below. Please note that based on your settings, not all functions of the website may be available. You can manage your preferences by visiting “Cookie preferences" at the bottom of any page.

Your cookie preferences have been saved.